The Art of the Surrender: How to Lose a War You Were Winning....

Part Two: What in the fresh hell are they doing?

This is a follow up to yesterdays public information that the US might be willing to allow Hamas keep it’s weapons while getting a sweet peace deal.

So let me get this straight.

The Trump administration is now floating the idea of letting Hamas keep their weapons. Yes. The same Hamas who’s been lobbing rockets like party favors and stashing explosives like it’s a post-apocalyptic Costco. This isn’t satire. This is real life. Somewhere in a D.C. boardroom, someone actually said, “Hey, what if we let the terrorists keep their missiles, but promise to play nice?”

I mean, seriously. What’s next? Letting bank robbers keep the getaway car as long as they pinky swear they won’t hit the same branch twice?

Back in September, Netanyahu had them. Cornered. Cooked. Hanging by a thread in Gaza with nowhere to run and nothing left to lose. And then Captain Art of the Deal shows up, taps him on the shoulder and says, “Let’s not finish this. Let’s talk peace.”

Peace? With a group that treats ceasefires like snack breaks?

And now, like clockwork, not 24 hours after I published my last piece warning that this whole thing reeked of strategic stupidity, what do we find out? Oh, just that Hamas is already back at it. Not even pretending to play ball. They’re stashing weapons overseas — in Africa, Yemen, who knows where else; stockpiling them like doomsday preppers at a flea market. Ready to funnel them back into Gaza whenever the next “peace deal” inevitably implodes.

You can’t make this stuff up.

So let me guess. The grand strategy is to pretend they’ll disarm while they load up on outside help, then act shocked when rockets start flying again. And the taxpayer-funded brain trust running this circus? They’re fine with it. Because heaven forbid we “stall” the peace process.

Tell me I’m wrong.

This isn’t a peace plan. It’s a permission slip for terrorism. It’s the geopolitical version of letting the fox guard the henhouse and then blaming the feathers on “logistical misunderstandings.”

Here’s a thought. If your “peace” deal involves letting a terror group keep their weapons, you’re not negotiating peace. You’re surrendering in slow motion.

But sure. Let’s all hold hands and pretend this isn’t the dumbest peace agreement in modern history.

I’ll wait.
Because nothing says “peace process” like helping a terror group restock for round two. Bravo, geniuses. Bravo.